Various problems with Onslaught's own chronology

Discuss chronologies for characters in the main "Marvel Universe"

Moderators: Col_Fury, michel, Arthur, Somebody, StrayLamb

Post Reply
robfj
Chronology Guru
Chronology Guru
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:50 am
Location: England

Various problems with Onslaught's own chronology

Post by robfj »

1) The order of C 34, IH2 444 and IH2 444-FB seems confused.

Firstly I can ignore the Nathan Summers app in 444-FB because it's Cable remembering a totally separate event from when he was being raised with the Askani.

The other FB involves Janis Jones' memory of when she saw Hulk being taken over by Onslaught and sent after Cable.
Then the possessed Hulk fought Cable in C 34, continuing into IH2 444 (not-FB) until Storm shocked him out of possession.
Hulk correctly has IH2 444-FB, C 34, IH2 444. The partial lists of Cable, Janis and Storm don't disagree.
But Onslaught has C 34-BTS, IH2 444-FB-BTS. If he's BTS in C 34 because he possesses Hulk then he's also BTS in the main part of IH2 444 as well as the FB bit (which is out of order). He should really have IH2 444-FB-BTS, C 34-BTS, IH2 444-BTS.

2) Onslaught is the only 1 with FF 416 before IH2 445. For Crystal, Hawkeye, Iceman, Mr Fantastic and Vision IH2 445 comes 1st.

3) Onslaught is the only 1 with IM 332 before IH2 445. For Giant-Man, Quicksilver and Teen Tony Stark IH2 445 comes 1st.

To decide the order of FF 416 and IM 322 after IH2 445 I refer the reader to Black Panther who has FF 416 1st, which agrees with Onslaught.

ONSLAUGHT II
----
ONS:X
UX 335
IH2 444-FB-BTS ** moved from after C 34-BTS
C 34-BTS
IH2 444-BTS ** added
A 401-BTS
FF 415
XF 125
X2 55 (1 - 10)
ASM 415-BTS
SM 72-BTS
XM 19
X2 55 (11 - 23)
UX 336
XFOR 58
C 35
IH2 445
FF 416 ** moved from after C 35
IM 332-BTS ** moved from before IH2 445
A 402
X2 56
ONS:M/U (4 - 16)-FB
----

Professor X's shorter list is unaffected.

PROFESSOR X/CHARLES FRANCIS XAVIER
----
ONS:X-BTS
UX 335
FF 415
XF 125-BTS
X2 55-BTS
UX 336
X2 56
ONS:M/U (4 - 45)-FB
----
Post Reply