Marvel Chronology Project

cweed4 wrote:What criteria does the MCP use to distinguish which of these appearances should and should not be included?

Is it really Spider-Man, or Daredevil? Do they actually appear?

The questions are rhetorical.


watching: batman begins

tlynch wrote:I'm happy to try to work up a chronology for him if people would like

Yes, very much. Thanks!


watching: northern exposure

Welcome aboard, Dale! Looks like you were one of our first members. I think you'll find the posting gets easier, the more you do it. So if my math is right, you would have signed up for Marvel about the time of Amazing Spider-Man #100?


watching: kiss kiss bang bang

Ork wrote:NEW AVENGERS #34 (1-7)
refers to A4 33 (4-22)
should refer to A4 33 (14:22)

The twenty-second panel of page 14?

In addition to the SHIELD and Tony Stark tie ins, they also talked about the Super Solder experiment during WWII. I think Marvel's on to something here by lacing all their movies with foreshadowing of events to come. It keeps this old fan boy eager for what's next. BTW - what do we think happend to...

That's not a bug. It's intentional. The page isn't ready for publication.

Sorry admin I wasnt criticizing I was just saying why I couldnt find it based on your system on ebay or anything. to answer your question which may have been rhetorical I put my books by charcter then chronological. I always counted ongoings even cancelled ones as volumes, So i'd have Namor Volume ...

I solved the Namor Problem though you people and the spiderfan people but his 4 issue mini which never was gonna be an ongoing as a Namor (insert words before namor in heading) and volumed it. I dont do that in my own filing, mystery solved anyway. Where do you put the 4 issue mini in your filing?

Paul Bourcier wrote:Left to my own devices, I'd probably code SUB-M2 as PNSUB-M.

Did you code Master of Kung Fu as HOS-CMOKF?

Flashbacks are not eligible for concurrent ("~") appearances.

This is a list of the analyses that have been sent to the Forum Archives. The number after the colon is the archive number. Link to the archives is at the bottom of the page. If the archive hasn't been added to the archives page, then the analysis is still here, in the Issue Analysis Forum. I have a...

michaelyuri wrote:Or maybe this is already being kept track of behind the scenes in some way that could be exposed.

Yes to that one. Maybe this evening I can post some of the information we have.


watching: house

tobyoryamcha wrote:I seemed to take that as our analysisis (sp?) (analysees?) wont affect the list.

They don't directly affect the list. It's just one step in the process that leads to books being removed from the Checklist. Michaelyuri stated it well.


watching: nancy grace

Toby, I have to ask: Where did you hear that we "will not add them to characters chronologys or take them of the checklist"? Books that are analyzed on the forum WILL eventually be added to character chronologies (assuming the analysis is valid), and the analyst receives credit on the Upda...