Marvel Chronology Project

Doc Holliday's chronology only consists of his appearances in Rawhide Kid vol. 4. Here are some others:

Gunsmoke Western #33c
The Rawhide Kid #35c, 46a
Two Gun Western #8d
Two-Gun Kid #10b
Wild Western #55c

Tommy Tyme's chronology only lists a single one of his appearances. Here are the others in publication order: Young Allies #8b Young Allies #9b Young Allies #10b Young Allies #11b Young Allies #12b Kid Komics #5d Young Allies #13b Kid Komics #6c Mystic Comics vol. 2 #1e Mystic Comics #2g Young Allie...

Cleopatra is missing some appearances from her chronology:

Battlefront #24d
Ideal #1a
Mystery Tales #26d

Wild Bill Hickok doesn't currently have a chronology. Here are some appearances that could be used to make one: All True Crime Cases Comics #26 The Gunhawk #16e Gunsmoke Western #67e Kid Colt Outlaw #12d, 28d, 105d Man Comics #1e Quick Trigger Western #12d The Rawhide Kid #18c, 48b, 61a Rex Hart #8c...

Billy the Kid's chronology currently consists just of his appearances in Rawhide Kid vol. 4. That's pretty weak. Here are some more appearances: All True Crime #42c Black Rider #11e Cowboy Action #11f Gunsmoke Western #71a Kid Colt Outlaw #14d, 17b Lawbreakers Always Lose #2e True Western #1a Two Gu...

I was referring to the handbook references, not to the indices. But like I said, I don't want to argue about it.

Oops, I forgot to include this in my last post:

Marvel Illustrated: The Three Musketeers #1-6

I would prefer to maintain what's said in all sources, and so not rule out what's in the handbooks unless there's an explicit statement saying so from an official source. After all, if there were a conflict between an earlier comic story and a later comic story, we'd try to maintain both if we can, ...

There are Hostess villains that appeared in Fin Fang Four Return! as well, so there are quite a few 616 Hostess characters. The handbooks also explicitly refer to a number of the Hostess ads as 616 stories. So why think that all the Hostess ads take place on Earth-51914? Doesn't the evidence (especi...

Here are a few more 616 stories missing from MCP published after FF #1, all of which are referenced in official sources (e.g., later 616 comics, handbooks, indices) or feature characters who appear in other such official sources: Amazing Adventure #1f Amazing High Adventure #1a, 2b, 3b, 5b The Amazi...

That was the premise of my post, based on your premise. If they weren't licensed, I can promise you that Marvel doesn't treat them as canon. Your premise here is that they may have been licensed. You've moved the goal post. I don't think I have. I said your example isn't a good parallel, because th...

But even if they were [unlicensed], I don't see why that's a reason to ignore them. I do. They weren't published by Marvel. Marvel says they're not canon. This is covered in the FAQ , in the follow-up to Question 15. Using your reasoning, I could scribble out a Spider-Man comic, run off a dozen cop...

the new Mexican stories were written to maintain continuity with the rest of the series they were a part of. Doesn't this mean they're part of a different continuity, then? No. The series they're a part of is the officially licensed Spanish translations of the American editions of Amazing Spider-Ma...

It's my understanding that the legal status of some of these non-English comics is unclear and that we don't know for sure that these comics were unlicensed. But even if they were, I don't see why that's a reason to ignore them. These Mexican Spider-Man comics were published within a series that was...

In addition to the items vanhornluke mentioned, there are a couple of other books on the FAQ's Non-Canon List whose status I'd question. Beavis & Butthead : While the series as a whole is obviously non-canon, in issue #14 the pair read an otherwise-unpublished Spider-Man 2099 comic which is ref...