Rufus T. Hackstabber

Discuss chronologies for characters in the main "Marvel Universe"

Moderators: Col_Fury, michel, Arthur, Somebody, StrayLamb

Post Reply
Clive_Reston
Chronology Guru
Chronology Guru
Posts: 474
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:42 pm

Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by Clive_Reston »

This Groucho Marx analogue appears in issues of at least three series:

GSMOKF 4
MOKF 52
NDEF 148
loki
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 407
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:37 pm

Re: Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by loki »

He's also BTS in NDEF 133. He makes a phone call to the detective Typhoon. Speaking of which, neither she nor her husband are listed:

CUTLASS, OLIVER
NDEF 133
NDEF 148

TYPHOON (KWAN TAI FUNG)
NDEF 133
NDEF 148

She'd be Typhoon I if you prefer to number them, and the currently listed Typhoon (a First Line foe) would be Typhoon II.
User avatar
Col_Fury
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 7754
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 3:37 am
Location: on a Helicarrier, above Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by Col_Fury »

Wasn't the First Line foe Typhoon active in the '60s, and this Typhoon in the modern era? If so, Kwan Tai Fung would be Typhoon II.

Good finds, people! :thumbsup:
-Daron Jensen
loki
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 407
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:37 pm

Re: Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by loki »

Col_Fury wrote:Wasn't the First Line foe Typhoon active in the '60s, and this Typhoon in the modern era? If so, Kwan Tai Fung would be Typhoon II.
Yes, true, so if you are going with when they were active vs when they debuted in the real world, then the numbers are the way you stated. This is, btw, another example of why a numbering system sucks. One retcon character inserted prior to existing ones, and all the existing numbers go out the window.
User avatar
Somebody
Director
Director
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by Somebody »

loki wrote:Yes, true, so if you are going with when they were active vs when they debuted in the real world, then the numbers are the way you stated. This is, btw, another example of why a numbering system sucks. One retcon character inserted prior to existing ones, and all the existing numbers go out the window.
See also: Ghost Rider.

(No, seriously, go look at the G page...)
loki
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 407
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:37 pm

Re: Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by loki »

Somebody wrote:
loki wrote:Yes, true, so if you are going with when they were active vs when they debuted in the real world, then the numbers are the way you stated. This is, btw, another example of why a numbering system sucks. One retcon character inserted prior to existing ones, and all the existing numbers go out the window.
See also: Ghost Rider.

(No, seriously, go look at the G page...)
:D You don't have to tell me! I wrote Appendix entries on most of those other Ghost Riders.
metaldragon
Chronology Guru
Chronology Guru
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by metaldragon »

Typhoon was her nickname wasn't it? It's not like she's a superhero/villain... something along the lines of: Kwan "Typhoon" Tai Fung...?
"May the Light shine forever!"
loki
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 407
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:37 pm

Re: Rufus T. Hackstabber

Post by loki »

metaldragon wrote:Typhoon was her nickname wasn't it? It's not like she's a superhero/villain... something along the lines of: Kwan "Typhoon" Tai Fung...?
Yes, nickname.
Post Reply